In 2012, Sarah Palin becomes the GOP's John Edwards. However, she'll go on making more money at speaking engagements than George W. Bush.
12
comments:
NotMyFlop
said...
Well, her hypocrisy was on display as much as her legs in her interview with Chris Wallace on FoxNews when she slammed Rahm Emmanuel for calling obstinate liberals the dreaded "r" word, but she said Rush was being satirical when Rush used same word to defend Rahm but saying the word fits those stubborn liberals.
That will come back to bite her again and again (I hope).
She is not the future of the Repubilcan party; moderates like Scott Brown have best chance of brining back the "Reagan Democrats" (i.e, indenependants).
No big players in the Democratic party are around to attract them like Bill Clinton did.
Well, I'm sure she has skills Perry doesn't have (gut and field-dress a moose), so she has a better chance of surviving being lost in the forests of the Pacific Northwest.
But I don't think she's as well-read as Perry (i.e., well-trained), and raw common sense he's probably a shade better because he's wise enough not to believe 100% of what smoke is being blown up his back-door.
Perry is nothing more than a wanna-be charmer, and Palin, well for someone who quit as governor and writes answers to questions not yet asked on her hands, I REALLY wouldn't be talking, or speaking, or blabbering, or whatever stupid vitriol she spews out of her mouth. Although I heard she was really good in 'Nailin Pailin.'lol XD
Speaking of Governers, isn't the Democratic debate for Governor on tonight?
12 comments:
Well, her hypocrisy was on display as much as her legs in her interview with Chris Wallace on FoxNews when she slammed Rahm Emmanuel for calling obstinate liberals the dreaded "r" word, but she said Rush was being satirical when Rush used same word to defend Rahm but saying the word fits those stubborn liberals.
That will come back to bite her again and again (I hope).
She is not the future of the Repubilcan party; moderates like Scott Brown have best chance of brining back the "Reagan Democrats" (i.e, indenependants).
No big players in the Democratic party are around to attract them like Bill Clinton did.
Could Rick Perry be the future, as Texas Monthly suggests?
Lets hope not. Perry is just a smarter Bush or like my husband suggested "A dumb Joe Biden?"
<< Lets hope not. Perry is just a smarter Bush or like my husband suggested "A dumb Joe Biden?" >>
hahaha - I like that.
But what's really sad is Perry is nowhere near as smart as Bush, he's just more polished in front of the cameras. (no, that's not an Aggie joke).
But is Palin smarter than Perry?
Well, I'm sure she has skills Perry doesn't have (gut and field-dress a moose), so she has a better chance of surviving being lost in the forests of the Pacific Northwest.
But I don't think she's as well-read as Perry (i.e., well-trained), and raw common sense he's probably a shade better because he's wise enough not to believe 100% of what smoke is being blown up his back-door.
True. I suppose Perry isn't so much smart. He is just really good at faking "not dumb".
Perry is nothing more than a wanna-be charmer, and Palin, well for someone who quit as governor and writes answers to questions not yet asked on her hands, I REALLY wouldn't be talking, or speaking, or blabbering, or whatever stupid vitriol she spews out of her mouth. Although I heard she was really good in 'Nailin Pailin.'lol XD
Speaking of Governers, isn't the Democratic debate for Governor on tonight?
Palin is smarter than Al Gore.
Palin or Perry both are premadonas bubbleheads.
___perry y palin are both "viejas calientes"
Al Gore is the real idiot. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Post a Comment